First — talk for 2 minHas anyone heard about a strike — UAW, teachers, baristas, anyone? What did the workers want? What happened during the strike? If no one, Mr. Bennett will share about the 2023 UAW strike.

How long does $825 million of leverage last?

A union strike works when the workers can outlast the company. Workers stop making cars; the company stops making profit. Whoever can hold out longer wins the contract. The number that decides who wins is not on a picket sign — it is in a bank account called the strike fund.

In September 2023, the United Auto Workers (UAW) walked out on Ford, GM, and Stellantis with about $825 million in their strike fund. The union has about 146,000 members at the Big 3, and strike pay is $500 per worker per week. If every member walked out at once, the fund would burn at \(146{,}000 \times \$500 = \$73\) million every single week.

Instead of calling a full strike, UAW tried something new: a Stand-Up Strike, where only some plants walked out at a time. Fewer strikers means a slower burn. But the fund also earns interest and grows from public donations, while a longer strike makes more plants want to join — so the real burn rate is not flat. The fund value \(F(t)\) follows the equation \(F_0 \cdot b^{t} = k\), and the question becomes: at what week \(t\) does the fund hit the floor?

Worked Example #1 — Full strike (linear burn): how many weeks does $825M last?
ProblemIf every UAW member at the Big 3 walks out at once, the fund \(F(t)\) (in millions of dollars) drops by a fixed amount each week. Solve for the number of weeks \(t\) until the fund is empty.
DataFund: \$825 million. Members on strike: 146,000. Strike pay: \$500 / worker / week. Weekly burn = \(146{,}000 \times \$500 = \$73\)M / week. Equation: \(73t = 825\).
Word Bank divide multiply burn rate subtract isolate weeks linear
Number Bank 73 11.30 825 500 8.25 146
#Reasoning (fill in)Math
1 Each week, $73M leaves the fund. This is the weekly . \(73t = 825\)
2 To \(t\), undo the multiplication by 73. \(t = \dfrac{825}{73}\)
3 825 by 73 on a calculator. \(t = \dfrac{\,\,\text{}\,\,}{\,\,\text{}\,\,} \approx \)
4 This is a equation — \(t\) is not in an exponent, so no log is needed. No log used.
5 Answer in : at full strike, the fund lasts about 11.30 weeks (≈ 2.6 months). \(t \approx 11.30\) weeks
Worked Example #2 — Exponential burn: when does the fund hit $100M?
ProblemThe fund burns 9% of its balance each week (more plants join the strike, harder to feed every worker, but donations slow the loss to a fixed percentage). Solve for the number of weeks \(t\) until the fund hits \$100M.
DataStarting fund \(F_0 = 825\). Per-week factor \(b = 0.91\) (keeps 91% each week). Target \(k = 100\). Equation: \(825 \cdot (0.91)^{t} = 100\). Solve for \(t\) using \(\log_b(x)\).
Word Bank isolate logarithm inverse divide exponent decay factor add
Number Bank 0.91 100 825 0.1212 22.4 7.25 −0.0410 −0.9172
#Reasoning (fill in)Math
1 Start with the equation. The variable \(t\) is locked inside the . \(825 \cdot (0.91)^{t} = 100\)
2 both sides by 825 to isolate \((0.91)^{t}\). \((0.91)^{t} = \dfrac{\,\,\text{}\,\,}{\,\,\text{}\,\,} \approx 0.1212\)
3 Apply the — the inverse of an exponential. Use base 0.91 here, so \(t = \log_b(k/F_0)\). \(t = \log_{0.91}(0.1212)\)
4 Use the change-of-base rule to compute on a calculator. 0.91 is the . \(t = \dfrac{\log(0.1212)}{\log(0.91)}\)
5 Compute. The answer in weeks is about . \(t \approx \dfrac{-0.9172}{-0.0410} \approx \) wk
Activity 2 · The Leverage Clock — Scenarios A/B/C
Scenario A · Full strike (146k workers): burn = \$M / week. Solve \(73t = 825\). \(t \approx\) weeks.
Scenario B · Stand-Up Strike (46k workers at peak): burn = 46{,}000 \(\times\) \$500 = \$M / week. Solve \(23t = 825\). \(t \approx\) weeks.
Scenario C · Exponential burn (9% / week loss): Solve \(825 \cdot (0.91)^{t} = 100\). \(t = \dfrac{\log(\,\,\text{}\,\,/\,\,\text{}\,\,)}{\log(\,\,\text{}\,\,)} \approx\) weeks.
Conclude

Which strategy gives UAW the most leverage?

UAW's actual 2023 strike lasted 44 days (about 6.3 weeks) and spent only ~$58M of the $825M fund. They settled before any of the three scenarios above ran out. Why? Because leverage is what you don't have to spend — the company saw the burn rate and folded.

Compare the three scenarios. Use your worked examples and your activity answers.

Scenarios A & B — linear Full strike: \(t = 825/73 \approx\)   wk
Stand-Up: \(t = 825/23 \approx\)   wk
Leverage gain: Stand-Up lasts about  × longer.
Scenario C — exponential decay \(825 \cdot (0.91)^{t} = 100\): \(t \approx\)   wk
Half-life of the fund (when does it hit ~$412M?):
\(t = \log_{0.91}(0.5) \approx\)   wk

Reflect: Why does the Stand-Up Strike give workers more weeks of leverage than a full walkout? What other inputs (donations, sectoral bargaining, public solidarity) could a union change to make the fund last even longer?

Tier 2 · General Academic Words
Tier 3 · Union, Labor, & Math Words