First — talk for 2 minHas anyone in your family ever been in a union, or talked about quitting one? Has anyone been on strike, or know someone who has? If no one, Mr. Bennett will share.

A curve that humans drew

Carbon-14 has a half-life. Every 5,730 years, half of it is gone — not because anyone decided so, but because that is how the atom decays. Physics sets the rate. No vote, no law, no strike can move it.

In 1954, about 34.8% of US wage and salary workers belonged to a union. By 2024, that share had fallen to 9.9% — about 14.3 million members in a labor force of more than 144 million. When you plot the union density data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics year by year, the curve bends in a familiar way. It looks like decay. It looks, in fact, almost exactly like a half-life.

But unions are not isotopes. The Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 let states pass right-to-work laws. In 1981, President Reagan fired 11,345 striking air traffic controllers. In 2018, the Janus ruling ended fair-share fees for public-sector workers. Each event nudged the rate. If the curve looks like physics — but the rate was set by people — what would it take to bend it the other way?

Worked Example #1 — Read the Half-Life Model (forward)
Problem\(D(t)\) is US union density (% of workers in a union), t = years since 1954. Use \(D(t) = 34.8 \cdot \left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right)^{t/38.5}\). Predict the % in 2024 (\(t = 70\)).
DataBLS reports 34.8% in 1954 (post-WWII peak, Hirsch-Macpherson series) and 9.9% in 2024. The exponent \(t/38.5\) means one full halving every 38.5 years.
Word Bank exponent starting value half-life substitution factor multiply
Number Bank 70/38.5 38.5 1.818 0.283 9.85 34.8 70 1.21 9.58
#Reasoning (fill in)Math
1 Identify \(a\). It is the value when \(t = 0\). The math name is . \(a = 34.8\)
2 Identify the time it takes for the amount to drop to half. In the fractional exponent, this number is the denominator. \(h = \)
3 We put 70 in for \(t\) in the equation. In math, we call this swap . \(D(70) = 34.8 \cdot (\tfrac{1}{2})^{\,\square}\)
fill: \(\square = \)
4 Enter the whole equation into your calculator — type it exactly like this. Use parentheses around the fractional exponent, or the calculator will read it wrong.
34.8*(1/2)^(70/38.5)
\(D(70) \approx \) %
(BLS reports 9.9% — nearly identical.)

Three real union stories from around the world. Apply the same half-life math from the front: for each country, use the given model to predict union density in 2024. Show your work in the math column.

Problem 1 — United Kingdom (decay)
ContextThe United Kingdom's union density peaked at 50% in 1979. The Thatcher government passed laws weakening union power through the 1980s — and density has been falling ever since.
Model\(D(t) = 50 \cdot \left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right)^{t/38}\), where t = years since 1979. Predict the union density in 2024.
Show your work
\(D(t) \approx\) %
Problem 2 — New Zealand (sharper decay)
ContextNew Zealand had compulsory union membership until 1991. When the Employment Contracts Act ended it, density crashed from 60% in 1985 toward today's level.
Model\(D(t) = 60 \cdot \left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right)^{t/21}\), where t = years since 1985. Predict the union density in 2024.
Show your work
\(D(t) \approx\) %
Problem 3 — South Korea (growth — opposite story!)
ContextSouth Korean union density grew from about 10% in 2015 to about 14% by 2024, driven by reforms under President Moon Jae-in (2017–2022). Same math shape — but going UP instead of DOWN.
Model\(D(t) = 10 \cdot 2^{\,t/20}\), where t = years since 2015 (notice \(2^{...}\), not \((\tfrac{1}{2})^{...}\)). Predict the union density in 2024.
Show your work
\(D(t) \approx\) %
Reflect

Whose rate is the steepest? Whose direction is the opposite of the others? Why might that be?

Tier 2 · General Academic Words
Tier 3 · Labor & Math Words